
Happy talk and budget cuts.
President Edward Ray needs to be asked some serious questions as Oregon State begins a path that turns away from playing its role as a university. You can read about President Ray's proposals in the Fall issue of the
Oregon Stater. (Page 8.)
The question of whether or not Oregon State University can survive as a university facing a 30 percent reduction in state funding is a good question. Our elected representatives were unable to come up with priorities for the state that make much sense on the basis of our state's needs for its day-to-day operations, opting instead to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on show-and-tell projects for Green technology and cultural pursuits. (You can find out about "Oregon's Day of Culture
here.)
The serious work of running and building a university will be left for another day.
Instead, President Ray proposes happy talk--in line with the current pre-school attitude of our state's leadership--in his proposal for a "new structure" for the university. From the Oregon Stater (Oregon Stater, Fall 2009, "Focus on OSU's Strengths Key to Belt-tightening, Realignment Proposals, p. 6):
Division of Natural resources--"Healthy Planet"--Agricultural Sciences, Forestry, Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences.
Division of Health Sciences--"Healthy People"--Health and Human Sciences, Pharmacy, Veterinary Medicine
Division of Business and Engineering--"Healthy Economy"--Engineering, Business
Division of Arts and Sciences--"Basic Inquiry"--Liberal Arts, Science.
The only device not included with the President's proposal is the "Happy Face."
Seeing ones Alma Mater reduced to the level of Sesame Street should give one pause. Healthy planet, people, economy...basic inquiry? The university as inoculation against unhealthy planets, people and economies...advanced inquiry?
If you dig into the proposals of the President you see that there are several bright line issues that have been proposed and then disposed. Most shocking is the proposal to eliminate 500 course sections with low enrollment. Next? The proposal to eliminate or consolidate 30 academic programs. I would suggest a name change at some point:
Oregon State Paraversity. Not quite a university. Too big to be called a college. Or would Junior University work better?
The proposal to move the College of Education off campus to Bend isn't really significant. For those of you who have spent any time in the college, you know that intellectual inquiry isn't necessary for the granting of a degree in education. That is, if one school most closely fulfills the requirements for VocEd, it is the education school. The need for advanced skills in any of the sciences is at its minimum when one reviews the candidates that seek admission into the teaching community. The curriculum does not advance those with advanced training in any of the arts and sciences. The key to the School of Education is hitting the minimums, moving into your Senior teaching series and then gaining admission into the OEA.
If you and I were facing budget cuts of 30 percent, the first thing we'd be looking at is how to reduce the fixed costs facing our institutions. Instead of moving a college to Bend I would be closing the campus in Bend. Building an edifice or building a university?
Oregon shows on a daily basis its inability to arrive at adult resolutions to its budgetary problems. Rather than adopt the proposal to reduce government expenditures by $500-million dollars in the last session, it instead has passed new taxes that approach a billion dollars.
Friday
I wrote about the state's legislative revenue analysis. Maybe we need to, following the theme of our university's President, refer to this as
Healthy Government.
Where's that re-set button?