Saturday, October 13, 2007

The Oregon House






I just got back from a quick trip into Portland. On the way I took a quick detour through downtown Beaverton. What I saw there was shocking. Talking to business owners next to it meant talking to pretty pissed off people.



Instead of fixing the traffic problem in the Metro area, the state and Metro are building a billion dollar boondoggle to run two trains a day, from Beaverton to Wilsonville. It boggles the imagination. Here's the problem. Democrat Representatives in the Oregon House are lying to you if they say they are working for you. Portland is next to bankrupt and the State is spending billions on a railroad for two trips a day. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns.



Here's the breakdown:



House District #5. Democrat Peter Buckley. If you live in Jacksonville, Phoenix, Talent or Ashland, you need to find someone to run, either as a Democrat in the Primary, or as a Republican. When Portland goes banko, your taxes are going to bail them out.



House District # 8. Democrat Paul Holvey. This should be a Republican House seat. South Eugene and Veneta are populated with men and women who work and have families. It's time to challenge Paul Holvey in the Primary, or find a decent man or woman to run for the Republican nomination.



House District #9. Democrat Arnie Roblan. Coos Bay and North Bend needs someone to work for the timber and fishing industries. It's time to put all the groovey tourism crap to the side and think about jobs for men and women willing to work. Democrats used to be about working men and women. And as your property taxes go up, imagine how much more you'll have to give to help bail-out the Crazies in Portland. Portland is going to make you pay. Get a Democrat willing to work for your district, not hobnob with the Gifted Geniuses of Portland.



House District #10. Democrat Jean Cowan. Fishing towns like Yachats, Waldport and Newport have been on the ropes for years. Buying into the Responsible Growth Plan means your kids are going to be changing sheets and waiting tables for the gentle folk from Eugene and Portland. Let them change their own sheets. Get your kids back to work in the marine industry or the timber industry. Decent jobs, decent wages. And quality schools. Because you were working and could afford it. Now your schools rely on hand-outs from the state to stay open. Find a Dem who believes in the working man, or find a Republican who believes that you should work for your wages. Either way, the working man will find a friend who believes that one of your first rights is the right to a decent job.



House District #11. Democrat Phil Barnhart. Talk about a district that got screwed by gerrymandering. Jimmy Carter could get elected in this district. Take a look at your district map and ask, "Why did they put that middle-finger of Springfield into House District #12?" The answer is they wanted to take all that common sense out of district 11 and overwhelm it with the Eugene Commune. House District #11 is like the biggest political "comb-over" in the state. Creswell? It's up to you. West side of Lebanon and Sweet Home? You got pwnd by your Oregon sTate legislature. Face it, you guys are fried. You live in the biggest non-district in the state.



House District #12. E. Terry Beyer. Never vote for somebody who hasn't figured out what his own name is. The E. Terry Beyer should have been a dead give-away. But for a town where you can still walk into a tavern and have a smoke with your beer, this should have been an easy shot for you. And if you're a union guy you need to tell your rep that he's YOUR REP and find a Democrat who believes in jobs and working.



House District #13. Nancy Nathanson. Wasn't Mary Burrows your representative back when it was House District #41? Republicans have always been big on education. Democrats used to care about education, too...before they became hysterical about global warming and socializing medicine. Smart people in Eugene should ask why the brakes on Portland's slide into the precipice aren't applied. Eugene is looking over the edge, too. Be careful of some of your crazy mass transit ideas. And hey, being tolerant of different lifestyles doesn't mean you throw your brain out with the water...or somesuch thing. Dressing funny is cool. Taking your city into bankruptcy or having to bail out Portland because your representative is chummy with the Portland Mafia means YOU are not being represented. YOU are being an useful idiot.



House District #14. Chris Edwards. This should be a Republican seat. This is still Bethel-Danebo and Clairmont, isn't it? Decent people with decent jobs. North Eugene High School. Barney knew how to teach basketball, back in the day. You've been stuck with some of the worst representation in the history of the state. Don't remember who your legislator was back in the '70's and '80's? 'Course not. Back when Labor meant work, you voted for Democrats. Now that Democrat means Socialism, you should ask yourself if this is what you wanted and do you want it for your children? 'Course not. Find a Dem that believes in work or get a Republican. You can do better.






House District #16. Sara Gelser. She's cute. She's never run a business. She's cute. Cuddley. Adorable. How does she vote? For the people who pay the bills in Corvallis and Philomath, this should be a no-brainer. Tony Van Vliet was a great representative. He could talk the babble stuff with the long-hairs on the University campus with a sense of humor. He believed and voted for substantive improvements in our state's education system. Working with Mary Rieke the state was able to make some transformative changes in our state's school districts. Now we worry about whether or not Global Warming is going to be taught to enough children. It's time to move away from indoctrination back to education. But I don't think you can find a Democrat in Benton county that would stick his/her neck out. The status quo is good enough.



House District #21. Brian Clem. Ha! Another brutal victim of Gerrymandering. It took a lot of pencil work to find a way to create this district. If they did this kind of thing to South Boston schools they'd still be protesting school bussing. But in Oregon, you get cut off from your neighbors, from the folks you meet a school plays and concerts and you never know it. Good luck. You've been disenfranchised and you never even knew it.



House District #22. Betty Komp. I don't have any argument with Betty Komp. I know that she is disturbed by a lot of what she sees and has seen in Salem. If they hadn't drawn the district the way they did, she'd probably be a lot more forceful in her opposition to a lot of the plans drawn up by the Portland Mafia. As is, she represents a rural district that has been sliced into the two major towns of a rural district. It's unfair to her and her constituents. But, that's Oregon for you.



House District #27. He worked in the Clinton administration. He's got a job as a "product developer" for NIKE. Which you'd expect for a guy with Bachelors degree in Politics and Economics from Willamette University as well as a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the University of Washington. Which reminds me...isn't there a NIKE employee on the governor's Global Climate Change Group? This job couldn't be a placeholder, could it? I mean, a product developer for a company that makes sports shoes. What's next, Ping Pong shoes? An undeveloped niche? Tomorrow's profit center. NIKE's a big company. They deserve their own representative. And it's a company known for throwing some serious cash around. You milk that cow. You don't think steak.



House District #28. Jeff Barker. Lucy's got some 'splainin to do.



At the top of this page I mention the debacle of the "new train line" running through Beaverton. This guy has constituents who are being and have been screwed by the state and Metro.



When traffic gets even worse in Beaverton, put fliers out pointing out who your state representative was when all this nonsense when into place. But, the guy has never had a job outside of government work. So, perhaps this is all understandable. Guys who never have to worry about making a payroll never worry about it when they're in charge. Just ask Hugo Chavez. Eh?



House District #29. Chuck Riley. Smart guy. If he was in a district that represented people from the same community, this guy would probably have been a real thorn in the side of Governor Ted. But, again, gerrymandering has taken the urban centers out of rural communities and created a spaghetti string district that divides neighbors and separates community interests. In terms of getting elected, this is a "D" district. In terms of representing the people with investments in and around his district, this again is a case of silent disenfranchisement.



House District #30. David Edwards. This guy is "doable". Find a Republican who can talk about "central plannning and central planners" and the beauty of Planned Highway Congestion, crowded neighborhoods and stupid light rail, and you have a winner. Point out the billions being spent on a stupid trolley in downtown Portland. Talk about stop and go traffic between home and anywhere. Oh, and add that "they" want you to use a bike. Rattle him a little and he gets tongue-tied. Ask for efficiency? He'll talk about increasing the role of government.



Duck.



House District #31. Brad Witt. This district and House District #32 are examples of destroying the character of a community to ensure electable districts. They couldn't even draw the whole of Columbia county into the district because this would destroy their plan to split the population of Clatsop county down the middle. The problem Representative Witt has, again, is that his voice is limited the way the voices of Chuck Riley and Betty Komp are limited. By removing a community identity, these guys are forced to "go mainstream" since the mainstream narrative thread is what is propelling the Democrat party forward. Smart Growth? It's BS to folks in Clatskanie and Ranier. Ranier used to have one of the nicest high school campuses in the state until the Smart Growth people got in there and turned Trojan into an empty shell. (No pun intended.)



House District #32. Deborah Boone. Major achievement. Planning for animals in disasters. No, seriously, that was her big thing in the last session. Nobody noticed, but now we're going to have a central planning agency to make sure the doggies and the kitties and the birds and the horsies and the cowsies are planned for in an emergency. Because pet owners and ranchers--I guess--are just too stupid to be relied upon. This made major water in teh Animal crowd. I met and talked with one of these Animal people in Cannon Beach last winter. Oh, yeah, baby, for the right circle of friends this was a big one. For you and me and the guys who rely on animal stocks for their bread and butter? Look out for another reason for Big Brother to tell you how to run your life. "I'm from the Government? I'm here to help you." If the Republican who ran against her last time had half a brain he would have won. He was so bad, I voted for her.



Clatsop county has some major economic advantages. Splitting the representation in the Oregon House between North County and South County has been a terrific blunting force. But the Port of Portland is a major player in determining outcomes when it comes to marine resources...and wouldn't have it any other way.



House District #33. Mitch Greenlick. Another smart guy. The only smart guy problem I have is that when you present them with a problem they get involved in trying to solve the problem. He's been co-opted. He doesn't even know it. He's doing what people elected him to do. Solve problems. My problem? Government doesn't solve these problems well. But you give a guy a stick and tell him to beat a dead horse, don't be surprised when he comes back asking for a bigger stick. A Republican could beat him. Just talk about commute times, congestion and Smart Growth. And the fact that Portland is going down the Bankruptcy Hole.



Solving problems is great. Accountability for your solutions? Meh.





House District #34. Susan Bonamici. Between the light-rail fiasco and Smart Growth congestion, holding her accountable to the voters for her decisions should be a no-brainer. There's nothing wrong with her resume. She got bored being a mom. Great place to be. Raising funds for worthy causes. Great place to be. Try running a business with "a great place to be". This one should be a pick-up.



House District #35. Larry Galizio. His resume is all you need to know. Smart Growth? Excellent idea. And don't forget, because of him, Tigard now has two off-leash dog parks. This guy's not even a moving target. Empty words and phrases when you dump onto the I-5 everyday...let people know that the reason why it takes twenty minutes to pick up Johnny at grade school 3 miles away. Like, they're gonna build a light-rail spur between your house and Johnny's school.



House District #36. Mary Nolan. Abortion, environment, education. Boiler-plate. But didn't at least part of her district used to belong to Phil Lang? Ms. Nolan needs to learn that if given a choice, people would prefer parking and highways to Smart Growth. Did you know most people in her district have never heard of Smart Growth? Talk about the billions being spent on a railway between Beaverton and Wilsonville. Wilsonville, the Destination of the South! If you're on Council Crest you wanna get to work. You don't want the City to go Bankrupt. You're educated and would love to vote for a Republican who isn't tied up with this Abortion/Pro-Life dichotomy. Betcha Guiliani carries this district.



House District #38. Greg Macpherson. LO is a snitty community, but they aren't dumb. Are they ready to admit that things aren't getting better? States provide fundamentals. Like, how can I get there from here? Mary Rieke never stroked the voters. Stop talking about spending more money on things "we don't need" and make sure teachers, communities and people have the tools to make things work. BTW, I've heard that GM may have some surprises coming up. We'll see.



House District #40. Dave Hunt. Just saying House District #40 brings back some great memories. Starting back in 1975, House District #40 was represented by one of our state's great men, David Frohnmayer. Of course, back then Lane county had some great legislators; Mary Burrows, Dave Frohnmayer, Bill Rogers and George Wingard. It had some real stinkers, too. But back then the stinkers were more "laughable". Anyway, I digress. After the latest round of gerrymandering, the New District #40 is in Clackamas county. How the mighty have fallen.


There's something about the Republican party in Clackamas county that I haven't liked for, oh, say, 30 years. Maybe I'm wrong. But the central committe has always seemed to be populated by people willing to "draw the line" without worrying about electability. Maybe it's justified? They have some great leaders. State Senator Roger Beyer. State Senator Larry George. Representative Vic Gilliam, Representative Jerry Krummel, Representative Scott Bruun (who is also one of the few CFO's in the Legislature), Representative Wayne Scott, who is also the House Minority Leader, Representative Linda Flores and Representative Patti Smith. All I'm saying is, go to one of their central committee meetings. It will be coming up next year. Just go. It'll open your eyes.

Anyway, District 40. Dave Hunt. This guy was elected Majority Leader. So when you're voting to repeal property rights or to put a tax on cigarettes into the state's constitution, remember, this is the guy who made is possible. When you're stuck idling on the freeway, remember, this is the guy who made it possible. When you look at the billions being spent of a twice-daily train between Beaverton and Wilsonville, remember who made it possible. When the state's SCHIP initiative gets passed and your find out the funding isn't there and your taxes go up, remember who did this to you. Is Dave Hunt gonna have some funds? You betcha. This is the Leftie finger up the nose to Clackamas county. Should he get re-elected? Ha! This is a guy who thinks building a healthy economy means more government money. Would you vote for him?

House District #41. Carolyn Tomei. Wasn't this Wally Priesty's district in the '70's? This neighborhood would have benefitted most from the Mount Hood freeway. At the time, this district was a mix of blue-collar/middle-low income and an elitist set of thinkers from Reed and Eastmoreland environs. How's the 99 working today? Smart Growth? Gimme a break. There are lots of folks around Kellogg Creek who would love to be able to get to their boats and work within minutes. Increasing density drives the value of their homes down. The next time you run down to the Acropolis for lunch, remember her commitment to light-rail. Obviously the Dems think she's in a safe seat or they wouldn't have made her the poster child for light-rail. Actually more busses would make sense. But they're not sexy. They're cheaper and more efficient at moving a lot of people quickly, to and fro. But, they're not sexy. You want to move commuters off the streets? Give 'em busses. And lots of them. The voters will love you.

House District #42. Diane Rosenbaum. Ethics and Rules in the Oregon Legislature is an oxymoron. For the first time in Oregon history the decision to have an "emergency" session was made before the past session ended. This is a violation of our state's constitution. But, when you're in charge of Ethics...anything is possible, neh?

First things first. Take a look at a map of her district. Take a look at the map of Representative Phil Barnhart's district. The thing I want you to look at is the shape of the district. Now take a look at Betty Komp's district. Or Chuck Riley's district. See the similarities and the differences?

Diane Rosenbaum's district approximates Phil Barnhart's district in shape, more than it does Betty Komp's district or Chuck Riley's district. At first blush one might be tempted to say that my accusation that Phil Barnhart's district was a victim of malicious gerrymandering might not be supported by the shape shown on these maps. Aha! This is one of the egregious errors allowed by the reviewing body. (Hmm. Who could that be? And who appointed them?)

But a closer look at Barnhart's map shows that while the shape approximates that which would would be conceived of as a "normal district", if you examine it one fact pops out: In Barnhart's district all the population has been spread on North/South East/West poles as is physically possible by the map makers. There's a lotta land there, but any votes from the nearest cities to the folks that live there have been stripped out: Lebanon, Sweet Home, Springfield and Junction City. So folks who send their kids to school in those towns have no common cause with other parents in the school district. What was the old dictum? Divide and conquer? (Machiavellian? In Oregon? Watcher Mouth!)

Then compare the extent to which this "block" approach has been avoided by Komp's and Riley's districts. Nothing but urban...in a rural area. My kids go to school with your kids, but you've got a town job and I've got a real job. Are real communities being served by this type of gerrymandering? I don't think so. I don't think you think so. Gerrymandering isn't about representation. It's about electability.

So why this rant when talking about House District #42? In the history of Portland, in the history of Oregon, has this district ever elected a Republican? Wasn't Phil Brady it's rep in 1939?

Wasn't Ward Cook it's representative in 1955?

Was it Jim Chrest's in 1977?

In other words, hasn't this district been profiled as being safe for Democrats? Yeah. Sure. And hey, there's nothing wrong with having a solid community with solid community beliefs however crazy as they may be. Ms. Rosenbaum may be a perfect fit for this community. And, she has delivered. They are spending billions to bring a "trolley" to the East Side. You wanna know where your tax dollars are going? Right into Speaker Pro TemporeRepresentative Diane Rosenbaum's district. Deliver the pork? No bad. Good job, Ms. Rosenbaum.

Any chance for change here? Phht.

House District #43. Chip Shields.

House District #44. Tina Kotek. Socialist. The Whole Bonanza. Smart Growth. Whatever nutty program to come down the pike. Never saw a solution she didn't like. Taking her on is going to be a gritty affair. Just remember, you can't keep crying wolf and expect the villagers to come running, time after time. Attack early. And keep it up. Her record is indefensible. The City of Portland is verging on bankruptcy. The state has asked for more responsibility than it can afford. Basic transportation needs aren't being met. And increased unionization of basic rights--your child's education--has moved taking care of our kids from being the goal to a by-product. But North Portland is fertile ground for change. And where is the Interstate Bridge project going to be next year?

House District #45. Jackie Dingfelder. I know too many people in the Alameda district to believe that a smart, competant Republican couldn't cruise this district. Want to talk about the "housing bubble"? This district wakes up looking at the interest rate. Find anybody with a banking/financials background and you'll walk to the finish. It would also help if you believed in jogging and playing some hoops at Grant Park. Take Smart Growth, bad streets and highways, municipal bankruptcy and lay this one in, baby. She's toast.

House District # 46. Ben Cannon. Boobie. District in transition. Gentrification. Same as House District #45. Did I mention door-to-dooring? Don't be mawkish. Let the other side be mawkish. I's and R's worry about wealth.



House District #47. If you've ever gone hunting with a good tracker you're always amazed out how easy it is to find your prey. Jeff Merkley has his fingerprints all over the place. Gentrification cuts both ways. You can attack the man. But, he's gonna stand up and defend every decision he's ever made. The right guy to beat him is living in this neighborhood right now. When was the last time you went door-to-door looking for your candidate? This guy is not looking for you. You need to be looking for him.

House District #48. Mike Schaulfer. Didn't I pick strawberries in Happy Valley? Representative Schaulfer is a union guy. The district has no problem with union guys. Have you done polling on immigration? Oh, I'm a racist. Yeah. Why the unions have backed union busting illegals is beyond me. Rank and file? They're okay guys. Leadership? Keep sending in the checks. This guy is redeemable.

And that's it.

What's it going to take to get over this death-spiral in Oregon? The Democrats have a two vote advantage over Republicans.

Two votes. And I've given you, what, 25 Democrat seats that are "do-able"?

There are some very smart men and women in the Democrat party. And just as we saw the Republican party dominated by evangelical/anti-abortion activists in the '70's, the Democrat party is being beleagured by a socialist/anti-productivity activist wing in this decade. No rational home-owner in Northeast Portland is going to accept the Smart Growth vision of more bicycles. And without adequate transportation, those folks are going to see the value of their homes decreasing. Measure 15 anticipated what's happening in Multnomah county. There is some chance that a "tame" State Supreme Court might find a reason to change the meaning of Measure 15. But, unlike New York City, Portland really shouldn't look for a federal bail-out. State Treasurer Randall Edwards may be taking credit for stuff that's going to boomerang in the next few years. By the way, is he running for re-election? No? Hmm.

The state is on the cusp of disaster. Which has followed Kulongoski around like an albatross during his entire career. When he showed up in 1975 people wondered where and how high his star would rise. With President Bush's veto of SCHIP financing, the crown jewel of Governor K's career as a politician will end on another disastrous note. His recent comments about finding a way to give illegal immigrants legal identification are going to further diminish his legacy. Driving an ill-conceived energy policy will boost costs of production in the state which, combined with higher corporate taxes, will further push away investment in the state. What has been amazing is the coterie of accomplices which have accompanied this governor on his unsated rush to create the nation's first eco-dystopia.

There are those, on both sides of the political divide, who are smart enough to have questioned the goals and ideology of the governor. But if you, like I, live in a small town, you know that the trappings of the office do, in fact, change the nature and character of the man. A guy you used to have beers with is now having cocktails with the Government Relations Director of Nike. Have you been to the Nike campus? Man. It's cool.

If you don't have a strong character, you'll fall for anything. Hans J. Morgenthau once wrote about the difficulty of "swimming against the tide". If you've ever read Marcus Aurelius you know how much he struggled against taking the advice of people who gave him the O'Rielly view. Populism is no replacement for intellectual rigour.

So, that's my take on the state of the state. We're voting for things we shouldn't be, and voting for people who shouldn't be running. But I guess that's the way things are everywhere, neh? To read the Oregonian or listen to Portland radio or Portland TV you'd think the entire state has gone Lefty. It hasn't. Just two votes in the Oregon House.
Got work to do. The State paying for a Railroad Line between Wilsonville and Beaverton. How many people in Wilsonville wake up wondering "How am I getting to Beaverton today?"
Youdda thunk somebody in Salem would have asked this question. Two votes.

Friday, October 12, 2007

ManBearPig or Bearmanpig?



My Egyptian friend encapsulates my feelings about the Nobel Peace Prize announcement today.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Stewart Dimmock Day, Take Two



The decision has been posted to the net. The decision feted October 3rd, 2007 in my post "Today is Stewart Dimmock Day". Among comments associated with that posting were such nuggets as:


"You failed to mention that the judge quite clearly expressed that the movie won't be banned from schools, as Dimmock, because the detected errors were minor in nature and that the movie contains four messages that are very well and truthfully documented: That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for goverments and individuals to do something about it." (Today is Steward Dimmock Day, OregonGuy, October 3rd.)


I can only suggest to the anonymous commentor that the judge found this to be the case:




This is one of the most troubling aspects of the current Global Warming campaign. And goes a long way toward explaining the childishness of its advocates. The campaign is clearly directed toward children or the childish. Take this quote from Mr. James Hansen, noted Global Warming advocate and head of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies:


"For whatever reasons, our captains have chosen to emphasize short-term profits. The captains are not stupid, though. They did not get to be the CEOs without being pretty smart. Thus is born a strategy to appeal to them through their grandchildren." (Global Warming: Swift Boating, OregonGuy, Sept. 28.)


In the UK, thanks to Stewart Dimmock, the kind of indoctrination envisioned by Lefties from the NEA to the DNC is not possible.


"What is forbidden by the statute is, as the side heading makes clear, "political indoctrination". If a teacher uses the platform of a classroom to promote partisan political views in the teaching of any subject, then that would offend against the statute. If on the other hand a teacher, in the course of a school day and as part of the syllabus, presents to his pupils, no doubt with the appropriate setting and with proper tuition and debate, a film or document which itself promotes in a partisan way some political view, that cannot possibly in my judgment be the mischief against which the statute was intended to protect pupils. It would not only lead to bland education, but to education which did not give the opportunity to pupils to learn about views with which they might, vehemently or otherwise, either agree or disagree. I conclude that the mere distribution by the Defendant to schools to facilitate their showing the film, and accompanied by guidance, to which I shall refer, is not per se, or irremediably, a promotion of those partisan political views." (Dimmock, "Local educational authority to forbid the promotion of partisan views in the teaching of any subject in the school", 12).


Which brings me to another comment posted here:


"You failed to mention that the judge quite clearly expressed that the movie won't be banned from schools, as Dimmock, because the detected errors were minor in nature and that the movie contains four messages that are very well and truthfully documented: That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for goverments and individuals to do something about it."


In fact, the judge writes of an attorney's notes in that regard, "Mr Downes produced a long schedule of such alleged errors or exaggerations..." and relates that "Mr Downes sensibly limited his submissions to concentrate on those areas where, as he submitted, even on Dr Stott's case there are errors or deviations from the mainstream by Mr Gore." (Dimmock, "The Movie", 22).


Sure, the judge ruled on the Nine Errors being reported around the net. But he looked at more. The thing is, the judge only needed so much finding of fact to rule for Dimmock. Dimmock can, and probably will be, excoriated by the Left. As noted above, but with different words and meaning, the judge pointed out that "Teaching staff will be aware that a minority of scientists disagree with the central thesis that climate change over the past half-century is mainly attributable to man-made greenhouse gases. However, the High Court has made clear the law does not require teaching staff to adopt a position of neutrality between views which accord with the great majority of scientific opinion and those which do not [this was anticipatory of my decision]." (Dimmock, "The Guidance", 40).


But what's interesting about the judge's decision is that it's clear that more than Nine Errors were taken into consideration. They are (from Dimmock, "The 'Errors', 24-33):


"The 'Errors'

1. 'Error' 11: Sea level rise of up to 20 feet (7 metres) will be caused by melting of either West Antarctica or Greenland in the near future.


2. 'Error' 12: Low lying inhabited Pacific atolls are being inundated because of anthropogenic global warming.


3. 'Error' 18: Shutting down of the "Ocean Conveyor".


4. 'Error' 3: Direct coincidence between rise in CO2 in the atmosphere and in temperature, by reference to two graphs.


5. 'Error' 14: The snows of Kilimanjaro.


6. 'Error' 16: Lake Chad etc


7. 'Error' 8: Hurricane Katrina.


8. 'Error' 15: Death of polar bears.


9. 'Error' 13: Coral reefs.


So, it's true that the Global Warming scare proponents haven't had all their toys taken from them. But I have hope. "For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known." (1 Corinthians, 13:1). And there's no denying that the judges comments on 4. 'Error' 3 are the most important words of this entire trial:




Fancy a bit of science? If you haven't viewed The Great Global Warming Swindle yet, I recommend you do so. Then, watch An Inconvenient Truth. As you sit through the AlGore film, it's as if you can hear the kids listening to stories about ManBearPig and wondering where this guy came from. The two graphs do not establish what Mr Gore asserts. And yet, it is that alleged "fact" that motivates the Global Warming crowd to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. So let's go back to Anonymous poster's comment:


"That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for goverments and individuals to do something about it. That climate change is made by man, that temperatures will rise further, that the climate change will have bad consequences and that it is possible for goverments and individuals to do something about it."


Now? Don't you see? It's okay for me and you to disagree about the climate. Men have been arguing about the weather for the past twenty years. But whether it anthropogenic or electromagnetic effects or sun spots that doesn't mean that efforts to regulate carbon dioxide has any meaning, beyond the metaphysical. If the data's wrong, attempts to regulate carbon dioxide are ridiculous, are they not?


That it is possible for governments and individuals to do something about it. Well, I don't think so. Especially if your first step is to attempt to regulate a gas that is naturally occuring. I think Mother Gaia has some 'splainin' to do. She regulates first. Then I'll start regulatin'.
P.S. Thanks to the reference frame for the video link. I had wanted to link this post to the video, originally, but found my old links didn't work. This version has French subtitles for the English-impaired!

The Camel's Nose




Hmm.

On Victoria Taft's blog there's a conversation going on about immigration and racism.

One of the comments was, "Whatever your personal residence, do you leave your doors and windows open and unlocked and allow unfettered access to your home by anyone desiring to enter and use your belongings, 24/7? If not, please explain why not?"

Let's say, "Yes I do". That is, assume that my doors and windows are unlocked. That there is unfettered access to my home by anyone desiring it. I guess it's because I feel I'm safe. But I don't put signs out by the highway pointing out that fact.

I trust my neighbors. Even visitors to the area.

But I guess I'd have to change if I came home and saw someone living there.

When your neighbors and friends are trustworthy, locks aren't reallly needed. A trusted friend or neighbor recognizes what's mine and what's his. If a neighbor needs something I'll generally help out. But something my dad told me years ago is still true today.

Don't lend anything.

That way, if it breaks or isn't returned your not out anything. If you're going to give something way, give it away. If you can't afford to give it away, don't.

If someone needs an implement, say a rake, I'll sell it to him. But I'd rather hitch it up and run it myself. If he needs help. It's mine. But I don't mind giving someone a gift from time to time. And if I get a check for fuel, I am thankful and take it.

Even when Dad lent me some money for a downpayment on a home he didn't lend it. He gave it to me. I paid him back. I figured if I ever wanted another gift that size again I should make sure he had it to give it. Had it been a loan repayment probably would have stretched out over a longer period of time. As it was I gave back everything I could in the shortest period possible. I didn't have to worry about "missing" a payment. Really. They weren't payments. I asked for a gift and got it. I gifted him back.

Migrant workers have been an ethical muddle to me for more than 30 years.

I became involved in "migrant workers' rights" back in the early '70's. The issue then was the living conditions imposed on migrant workers by farmers who invited them to work. Given their legal status, migrant workers were treated like victims of slavery. To my farm relatives it was as if I were a communist.

Their legal status was not the issue. That issue was a federal issue. What I saw and what I dealt with were state issues. If Oregon farmers were using a labor pool it seemed reasonable to me that these human beings be treated with a certain human dignity.

For most people today, as I see it, years of federal neglect of border security are coming home to the roost. Our de facto open borders policy has hit too many nerves. The evidence of illegal immigration is no longer restricted to rural or farm communities. Now in our cities we see entire crews of illegals putting up new houses, offices and shopping centers. Try finding a restaurant where the cook's a white guy. Or black guy. How many Hispanics are working at your favorite sushi bar?

In other words, as long as illegal immigration was only observed in rural and farm communities too many people ignored the problems of migrant workers. Too many people. The Lefty Elite in Portland, Salem, Eugene.

Thirty, forty, fifty years ago imagine visiting Hermiston during watermelon picking time. Forest Grove in strawberry season. Ontario during apple-picking time. Due to automation advances, wheat ranchers were able to increase their productivity through capital purchases. Compare the productivity of a today's combine with a combine 40 years ago and you'll see what I mean.

But apples, strawberries, beans, among other harvests, are dependent upon putting human hands out in fields. Picking ripe peaches or apricots is not a thing done well with machines. Genetic engineering is helping in some respects, by introducing variants that have textures that are more resistant to bruising. But it's been a long time since I've been able to buy a peach in a store. I remember what a ripe peach is supposed to be. Soft and succulent. But markets demand high volume and low price. It's the product you ask for that you get.

Out in the fields, forty years ago, you'd find school busses parked. Kids, from 10 to 18 years old were collected in suburban neighborhoods at four or five in the morning for the drive out to the fields. Kid's carrying paper bags with a couple of sandwiches, a pack of Twinkies and a frozen can of soda. By lunchtime the soda would be melted. It was hot in those fields.

In rural Oregon, farmers would talk to coyotes. My uncle in Salinas worked part-time as a coyote. These were the guys who would run down to the border and pick-up your crew. The pay was good. In a couple of days you could make five to fifteen hundred dollars delivering workers. Tax free. Or, as tax free as you dared. Which, after a couple of runs, meant tax free.

Occasionally you'd hear stories of tragedy. Truck rolls over killing men and women. But you never questioned the farmers. You'd never question border security. The evil guy? The coyote. These were people "trafficking in human beings!" Morally reprehensible evil doers. It was always the coyote who was at fault. But in what fantasy world do you not see the connection between the illegal immigrant and the farmer? Who is responsible for the use of illegal drugs?

It's the user. No users, not illegal drugs.

So farmers always got a free pass. They wrote the checks and the illegals flowed.

By the '70's a new phenomenon was observed. The illegals weren't leaving. They were settling in. They sent for their wives. They had children. Now what to do?

Well, what we did was, in the main, to ignore the whole thing. We, as in the federal "We". Locally "we" had new issues. Had you the opportunity to visit a farmer's "migrant camp" you'd see slave quarters...or worse. Families living in shacks without water or sewage. No electricity so no refrigeration. The kids were ignored. Schools? Hey, they're illegal!

When I listen to Mayor Guiliani talk about his experience with illegal immigration during his tenure as New York's mayor I liken his experience with mine. The unofficial policy of the federal government was to turn away from the problem. When coyotes with driving problems got into the news, the reaction was to condemn the heartless coyote. And, yeah, if you got caught the penalties would hurt. But the money? She is so good.

Border Patrol personnel have known all about this gray market for decades. It's the type of situation that engenders corruption. Up and down the line there are hand-shakes. People know people. People who need people are the luckiest people in the world. It should be the Coyote Theme Song.

My work in the '70's was to highlight the depraved living conditions of the migrant worker. My work was to bring attention to the plight of children growing up in Oregon without water, sewers, homes with floors...and without education. Want to solve the migrant worker problem through law enforcement? Fine. Raid the farms and fine the farmers.

Want to celebrate the status quo? Well, it's what we did. What I worked for was what I was taught was fair and right. You treat the people who work for you as family. I guess at this point I should insert some Biblical references. For those who disdain the Bible I only point out that the purpose and thrust of the Bible is to set rules for human behaviour. There's lots I disagree with. Lots I agree with. The point is, I have had an education based on both moral and ethical behaviour. Where the two diverge I tend to adhere to the rules of ethics.

If you've seen the TV ads with children covered with flies in foreign countries--followed by an appeal for cash--you glimpsed the condition of migrant camps in Oregon. Not just in Eastern Oregon. Outside of Dallas, Tigard, Sheridan. We, as a state, allowed these people into our communities to do our work and gave them nothing. Not even the least sanitary necessities. A sub class of human beings who had no rights. Children, American children, growing up without education.

My argument was that farmers, or as a collective association the State, should bear the costs of these externalities. In fact, that is one of the basic premises of government. To handle the cost of externalities. If we weren't going to enforce the laws as they existed, the State should deal with the externalities as accepted. The mere presence of legal, American children in migrant camps created a demand for their Constitutional Rights. The way our form of government is set up we are supposed to rely on the law and not men. The law, statute and administrative rule, was being violated by farmers. We petitioned our government for redress.

Today, finally, the issue of illegal immigration is a national priority.

In Victoria Taft's posting criticism is placed by Oregon Association of Nurseries Executive Director John Aguirre against groups like Federation for American Immigration Reform. According to FAIR's website:

"89% of Americans think illegal immigration into the U.S. is a problem (30% "extremely serious," 33% "very serious," and 26% "somewhat serious." (Time Magazine, Jan. 2006)".

"82% think that not enough is being done along the borders to keep illegal immigrants from crossing into the country. (New York Times/CBS May 2007)"

"79% “favor a proposal requiring employers to fire workers who use false identity documents.”(Rasmussen Report). Complete poll info here.

Well, it's about time!

Did we invite them into our homes? Yes.

Well, you didn't. But your neighbor did. And your neighbor paid his expenses getting here. So, yes, "we" did. I got called a commie by family. I tried to explain that legally, ethically and even morally we were required to enforce the law. State and federal law.

But too many years of wink and a nudge have let us to where we are today. And the impasse between approaches to how to solve the problem. I understand the moral commitment to these people offered by President Bush's approach to immigration reform. I understand the ethical issues offered by those who oppose his plan. And it's taken decades for us to get to this point. A point I have been making for 36 years.

If we invite them in we own the problem. To many the camel's nose is no longer the problem. We own a camel.

What are we going to do with it?

UPDATE: A federal judge has stopped the government from enforcing the law. Why? "Breyer said the proposal would likely impose hardships on businesses and their workers." Well, duh! There has been open disregard for the law for decades. So don't be surprised when a federal judge attempts to create law based upon past practise.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

I Don't Have Time to Post

But I saw this and laughed.

Later.

Monday, October 8, 2007

What I Celebrate On Columbus' Day



I held out till now. The point is that the dominant cultural ties of the New World to the Old were established by Columbus' voyage.

And reading Eric at Classical Values has kick-started the engine.

Columbus' Day. Columbus Day has always been a big one for me because of the Columbus' Day Storm. Which also allows me to talk about how big of pussies people living on the East Coast are.

Living at the beach, we regularly have winds above 100 mph. We don't get the news coverage because nobody lives here. And we built our houses right. I live in a 110-year old house that has seen more wind than a Democrat at an NEA convention.

The Columbus Day Storm was incredibly destructive though. On a personal level our grand Gravenstein tree lost almost a third of it's limbs. We completely lost a grand Black Cherry tree. And we completely lost our Cherry Pie tree. But the day was full of "fun" memories. Grabbing roller skates and an umbrella. Getting pulled up a hill on roller skates. Pretty cool.

Then, when it got time to pick up my sisters at Anita Pianova's Dance Studio in Beaverton. Dad came home early from work and he and I left to pick them up. It was only about a five mile drive, but it took us more than a half an hour to get there...and more than an hour to get back. Trees were falling everywhere. Power was out everywhere. By the time we got home it was dark and we had no power.

Fortunately, dad was a camper. So, we pulled out the Coleman stove, put a fire in the fireplace, and life continued on. We watched our trees come down. And the wind howled.

And, of course, my little sister's birthday was the 14th. Mom tried to bake a cake using a jerry-rigged oven...that was funny. But a few days later and life returned to normal. Kind of. Cutting up a 35 foot cherry tree was a lot of work. Most of our trees were intact. The prospect of the walnut tree going down had kept us kids up most of the night. If you haven't picked up walnuts, you have no clue. We, my siblings and I, hated that tree. And the cherry trees sister tree on the south side of the house survived. The north tree was between the house and the garage. Maybe the wind got funneled between both those structures. All I really remember is we had a lot of firewood after that.

But Columbus' Day after that was always about my little sister. She was four when the storm hit. And every year after that I only remember her birthday because of the storm...and Columbus' Day.

It was several years ago that federal holidays and school holidays diverged. Columbus' Day got thrown under the bus by schools. Teachers didn't want to lengthen the school year and they were required to teach a minimum number of days. So what do we have instead? On Friday we have a Statewide In-Service day. I know what it's supposed to be for. What it is is teachers wandering around the building with their coffee cups in hand. Week following at our high school is Parent/Teacher conferences. So, this is a good opportunity for teachers to do the work they should have done, if only they hadn't been so busy teaching!

When teachers stopped taking a holiday on Columbus' Day schools quit celebrating it. I grew up on "In 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue." I don't think kids today are getting that essential bit of cultural doggerel. It's like the story of Johnny Appleseed or Paul Bunyon. Essential parts of the mythic story of America are being discarded. And so, as well, is the mythic adventure of Christopher Columbus. Living in a town where the main thoroughfare is named Lief Erickson Drive I think you could guess that "we" know who "really" discovered America. But that is neither a problem, nor the point.

The point is that the dominant cultural ties of the New World to the Old were established by Columbus' voyage. For most of my life a de facto cultural diminuition of these ties has been in effect, present in every argument that relies on White Man, Colonialism, Imperialism, Exploitation, Capitalism, Male Dominated, Euro-centric and others as the dominant them of said argument. Face it, Columbus was a marked man. Poor Paul and Johnny? Never saw it coming. We've become a nation facing a future without heroes. And our major institutions, schools, newspapers, television, continually reinforce that sad fact.

It's reminiscent in some ways to Eugene Henderson's quest. We may know what we lack, but how do we find what we lack? What do we do when we no longer fit our society's definitions? Giles was raised a goat. But he wasn't a goat. I'm not a goat and I'm too old to be raised as one.

I know what I want. I want to celebrate authentic American heroes. The point is that the dominant cultural ties of the New World to the Old were established by Columbus' voyage. Columbus is a true American hero. Bounded by the political and scientific patriarchs of the age, Columbus set out to prove them all wrong.

Queen Isabella is an American hero, too. She listened to this guy and gave him her cash. She took a flyer. She was the bomb. Quintessential Americana. She took a gamble. It paid off. Even though the crew of the Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria contemplated mutiny. And the fact that, again, Columbus pulls this off is an essential characteristic of what it means to be an American. Just as the Mayflower Compact helps to define who we are, Columbus' insistence on success is held forth as a measure of American confidence. Just as the Pilgrims faced desolation, the crew of Columbus faced desolation. And just as the Pilgrims survived, the men of Columbus' voyage survived. Survived to return to Europe and proclaim a New World.

The nature and character of Columbus is American. Just as are the Pilgrims, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Johnny Appleseed and Paul Bunyon. These are the defining heroes of our country. To fail to celebrate our own heroes is to forget the link between Old World and New.

The point is, Americans are different. In the rush to be like the Europeans, to be liked by the Islamofascists, to humble ourselves on the alter of the United Nations, you may forget:

We are Americans. We are the sum of our heroes. Our heroes are not murderers like Che, Stalin, Mao. Our heroes don't oppress men and women like Castro, Khaddafy and Ahmenijad. Our heroes don't slaughter innocents like bin-Laden, Mugabe and Hamas.

Our heroes, like Molly Pitcher and Harriet Tubman. Men and women who valued being true to themselves. True to the American dream.

It's sad that me no longer celebrate Columbus' Day as we did when I was a kid. Back then it was okay to be an American. So here's the point of today's sermon:

The point is that the dominant cultural ties of the New World to the Old were established by Columbus' voyage. And it is that dominant culture that we celebrate today. And this should be remembered: if your culture is not the dominant one, it will be surplanted by one that is.

And I, for one, would rather be American than muslim, french, european or any of an hundred different things. As an American I control my own destiny. As I'm responsible for my own failures. I have the right to disagree with the common wisdom. And to succeed in bringing that common wisdom down. I have pride in being the son of immigrants, of Pilgrims, of Irish, Catholic, Protestant, German, Scandinavian...all of these things, but first of all, I am an American.

And that is what I celebrate on Columbus' Day.