Saturday, April 21, 2007

Response from Barnett


For those of you who have never heard of Thomas P.M. Barnett, I offer you this link, and as always, show a link on the right of this page.


After reading the Gates of Vienna post mentioned below, I wrote to Mr. Barnett to get his take on the following, which read in part:


“'The political and economic advantages that lead people to seek asylum in the West are the result of territorial jurisdiction. Yet territorial jurisdictions can survive only if borders are controlled. Transnational legislation, acting together with the culture of repudiation, is therefore rapidly undermining the conditions that make Western freedoms durable.'


"Scruton comments that for the first time in centuries Islam appears to be 'a single religious movement united around a single goal,' and that 'one major factor in producing this unwonted unity is Western civilization and the process of globalization that it has set in motion.' According to him, this is a result of 'Western prosperity, Western legal systems, Western forms of banking, and Western communications that human initiatives now reach so easily across frontiers to affect the lives and aspirations of people all over the globe.'


"Thus we have the irony in which 'Western civilization depends on an idea of citizenship that is not global at all, but rooted in territorial jurisdiction and national loyalty.' By contrast, Islam, which has been until recently remote from the Western world, is founded on an ideal 'which is entirely global in its significance.' Globalization, therefore, 'offers militant Islam the opportunity that it has lacked since the Ottoman retreat from central Europe.' It has brought into existence 'a true Islamic umma, which identifies itself across borders in terms of a global form of legitimacy, and which attaches itself like a parasite to global institutions and techniques that are the by-products of Western democracy.'"


Here is Mr. Barnett's response: "What you find is that some, who argue they speak for all, want disconnectedness.

"But when polled, nearly everyone wants economic connectivity.
"What they fear is loss of political control and too rapid social change.

"But no one's really against doing better economically, and that means connectivity--unless you're a dictator or wannabe."


If you've never read Mr. Barnett, take the opportunity to do so. He is one of the most influential men alive today. And get a copy of The Pentagon's New Map. He gives you new paradigms with which to view the evolving state of international relations...and the evolving state of nations. And, it could cheer you up!

Thesis: Muslims Are Leftists


A lot of the issues I have with our current state government have to do with the complete denial of existing state law by our legislature and governor. The legislature has already said they plan to ignore the state's constitution and have a session next year. The governor and the legislature are working hard to ignore Measure 37 while running pell mell toward higher taxes and the largest state budget in our state's history.


When you read this, "Is Islam Compatible With Democracy" ask yourself if the criticisms of self-governance exist in this state, in our country. It's a provacative read. Read down until you at least reach the word oikophobia.


Enjoy.

Friday, April 20, 2007

We Coulda Saved Joe Kennedy

Maybe Joe Kennedy would still be alive.

Maybe you don’t remember Joe. President Kennedy’s older brother. The Kennedy that didn’t come back. The one his dad doted upon. All he needed was for the congress to withhold funding for the war. To effect upon the United States of America its first defeat in war.

I’m trying to think of a former Senate Majority Leader who advocated the surrender of the United States to the enemy.

Alben Barkley? No.

Scott Lucas? No.

Lyndon Baines Johnson? No.

Mike Mansfield? Hmm. Think real hard. No.

Robert Byrd? Before Robert Byrd went potty, he was one of the greatest, thinking American minds in the country. No.

George Mitchell? No. Not while he was in the Senate.

Tom Daschle? Okay. We’re getting warm. But, no.

Harry Reid?

Ah, Harry Reid. The Man from Nevada.

Imagine the date is February 20, 1944. The Senate Majority Leader stands up in the Senate and declares that the war against Germany and Japan is lost.

"I believe ... that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Europe and the Pacific this week".

Hundreds of thousands of American casualties would have been avoided. Hundreds of millions of dollars in American treasure would not have been squandered. Congress passes a bill requiring US forces to return to the US within six months.

The war would be over in six months. We could bring our boys home. The Germans and the Japanese would not be able to understand how they had won the war by default. It’s fantasy. It’s unthinkable. But Joe Kennedy wouldn’t have died. He died because he was fighting his nation’s enemies. He gave his life for us.

He did not believe in surrender before clear evil.

But it’s what the Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid said, April 19th, 2007.

From Breitbart.com, “The war in Iraq ‘is lost’ and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country, the leader of the Democratic majority in the US Congress, Harry Reid, said Thursday.

"I believe ... that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week".

Question for the Leader. How many Americans must be murdered by Islamic terrorists before the words “death to America” from Malaysian muslims, muslims in Thailand and the Philippines, muslims in Pakistan, Iraq, Iran and Palestine, how many chants, how many religious leaders, how many state and national leaders must proclaim “death to America”, how many must die before you listen?

The Leader wants to tiptoe away from the Middle East and the muslim problem. Senator Gordon Smith agrees with him. Heck, even the Speaker of the House, Madam Pelosi, spent time with the infamous murderer Assad.

The thing I hate about these people is they dishonor our nation and our heroes. America is supposed to protect Americans. Our heroes do the dirty work. The least I could expect is that the men and women who lead us can see that we’re fighting a war. And that retreat is cowardice. Unless you subscribe to the sheer stupidity theory.

It’s possible.
(Found this exposition on the Schlongster's site. Ima adding it.)

Monday, April 16, 2007

So Much

And not a penny more.

There is a point where any man will ask, and so much more?

This has not been a good week. The capper? Probably the guv of oregon signing into law the type of ciggy that one can have. Trudat. Lefties want to take your smoke and change it. 'Cause they are smarter than you. Or me.

Signed it into law.

Me? I smoke. Love smoke. Love cigars, pipe, ciggies. They all play upon my "Marlboro Man" fantasy. Or, not. If you smoke, you love it. If you don't, you either put up with it or you complain. I don't care. Why should you?

Doesn't matter. In Oregon, they can tell you what to smoke. That's enough for them.

What chumps. Lefties are chumps. Just ask.