Friday, February 16, 2007

Tobacco Pockets or Your Pockets

Let's Take Jack and Dianne.

Two American kids growing up in Oregon, having been educated by public schools and told to vote Lefty.

The Government has come through for Jack & Diane. Jack makes $15,600 a year working 40-hours per week, fifty weeks per year. That's up $600.00 a year from last year's minimum wage of $7.50 per hour. Now, at $7.80 per hour, Jack and Dianne are sitting pretty!

Man, Six Hundred Bucks!

And it came just in the Nick of Time! Your taxes are going up, sucker!

Well, tobacco sucker. That's right, Jack and Dianne smoke. They know they shouldn't. You know they shouldn't. You shouldn't. But you do.

But Jack and Dianne do smoke, and even though they keep it away from the kids, they still end up spending $8.00 a day on tobacco. And they're not asking for much. Family of four, $15,600 a year. They get food stamps. Dianne and little Jackie are WIC recipients. For most basic medical needs it's the County Health office. A good night for Jack and Dianne are a couple of friends and some X-Box. Not that different from my life. Or, as a middle-school teacher I spoke with last Saturday, the world needs busboys, too.

So, not the "Go West, Young Man" kinda story. But Oregonian enough. And, frankly, Jack and Dianne are doing okay. They don't need help from Mom and Dad. They're getting by.

Not for long. The Lefties in the Oregon Legislature want to help them. How? By increasing the cost of their ciggies by $1.68 a day. More, if there's beer involved. (See, you have a beer, you gotta smoke. Vicious cycle.)

So, let's see. $1.68. Three hundred and sixty-five days a year.

$613.20.

It's like the state took the amount of the Minimum Wage, figured out the increase in earnings going to this poor family, and decided to confiscate it. To help this family.

But not really, because the Governor's "Kids Healthy Stuff" campaign will provide medical care for families earning up to $70-thousand dollars a year.

And to convince you that opposing this is wrong, the Lefties are having a Field Day on Monday.

If you oppose the Governor you're in the Pocket of Big Tobacco!

"This coalition has come together because we believe Oregon children should be at the front of the line when it comes to the state's priorities," says Maribeth Healey, Executive Director of Oregonians for Health Security. "The only opposition to the Healthy Kids Plan comes from Big Tobacco, which means the vote on Healthy Kids is clearly going to show whose side each lawmaker is on."

See? If you say--"ahem, bsht"--you're in the Pocket of Big Tobacco. Doesn't matter what Jack & Dianne had wanted to do with their additional dough. The State wants to help people that make Four-and-a-Half Times what J & D make to help the poor get health care!

And look at the Coalition. (Notice how Lefties love coalitions!)

"Organizations supporting the Healthy Kids Plan include: AAUW of Oregon, AFSCME Council 75, American Cancer Society, American Federation of Teachers-Oregon, American Heart Association, American Lung Association of Oregon, Children First for Oregon, Oregon AFL-CIO, Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems, Oregon Bus Project, Oregon Business Association, Oregon Education Association, Oregonians for Health Security, Oregon Health Action Campaign, Oregon Medical Association, Oregon Nurses Association, Oregon Pediatric Society, Oregon State Public Interest Research Group (OSPIRG), Our Oregon, SEIU Local 49, SEIU Local 503, Stand for Children, and the Tobacco – Free Coalition of Oregon."

I missed seeing the Poor People's Council. I don't see any migrant worker groups. What I see is a bunch of wealthy Lefties trying to peddle their trash on the streets of the Capital.

But if you oppose it? Maybe you can do the math. The Governor has bedmates. But, that's too creepy to think about.

Can this stupid tax on stupid behaviour be stopped? The Gov's "Healthy Kids" tax plan has already passed in the House Health Care and Revenue Committee. The only way to stop it is by stopping the Joint Ways and Means Committee. Write these guys and tell them to "kill the bill".

And make sure they know they're in the Pocket of the Little Guys.

4 comments:

THartill said...

Looks like it's time for J and D to fight back and start rolling their own....doing that would only cost them about $2 bucks a day and even with the new taxes they would be paying way less to the State than before.

MikeZ said...

I usually ask, do we really expect people to make a real living on the minimum wage? Do people expect to marry, raise 2.7 kids, buy a house in the suburbs, take the kids to soccer practice, retire to Florida, all on the minimum wage?

The Left will cry, "No of course not - give them more money"; the Right just might say, "the minimum wage is for people just starting out, just learning the ropes of a steady job, marking time till they can graduate and get a better-paying job".

I always wonder about those "coalitions". We just had an election in my county; all of the candidates were endorsed by at least several "organizations", with lovely names, like "Sherrifs for Justice", "Santa Ana Association for Better Government".

I have a feeling that 99% of those organizations - and maybe yours - have may-fly lives (pop up just before an election, die away just after).

The best ones have the word "Children" somewhere in their name. "It's for the chil-l-l-l-l-l-dren" - so how can you rotters possibly oppeose it?

"Stupid tax on stupid behavior" - how can you beat that?

Slightly off topic, but about the health plans looming over the horizon, Walter Williams has a good article on www.townhall.com titled "Do we want socialized medicine?". He writes about Canada and England.

A friend said the other day, "If you think health care is expensive now, just wait till it's free".

OregonGuy said...

Mikez-

There have been a number of "real-world" experiences in price control The famous ones are the Boston Transit System and New York City controlled rents.

The coolest one is going on now in
Venezuela. Take a quick google on what's happening to chicken and beef in markets there.

In Oregon, in 1973, the Governor asked for voluntary rationing of gasoline. The "voluntary" part of life was an induced hallucination.

Thirty-seven years ago we lived under a command economy of enforced price limts. Similar to the Usery Laws in practice by the state at that time, the government felt that it was an appropriate use of the coercive power of the state to limit the price companies could charge consumers for a good that they wanted to purchase.

The result? Long line of purchasers trying to buy a product unwillingly provided by suppliers.

I was a student at the time, working at a gas station to pay tuition. Hell of an education. Because who you know is more important than who you are. Never forgot it. Never forget it.

Back to your point.

Minimum wage.

Minimum wage is a "ceiling" just as price controls are a "ceiling". Because minimums are the lowest level at which we can conduct business, they're best known as "floors". I think that's where the nomenclature "entry level" came into being. My 1934 Websters doesn't recognize the word "entry level" and my 1982 abridged wouldn't care.

Minimum wage is set in order to enforce various work rules set by unions. Entry level wages for union work is set as a ratio of the minimum wage. Any increase in the minimum wage sets off a ladder of wage changes throughout the contract.

Are wages important? Sure. Just take a look at an employment page from Lefty icon and former grand wiz of the KKK's state, West Virginia, Senator Robert Byrd.

here

Unless your used to abnormally low pay rates, you wouldn't expect to see the prevailing wages from an East Coast state like West Virginia being this low.

So can a family of four live on our minimum wage? Yes. And quite well, actually. There won't be a Michigan or Harvard in our children's future without scholarship help, but life, poor, in Oregon is pretty good.

But unions only control government and school employees. Once we get that corrected, and everyone is an union employee, then you can expect the quality of life to go south.

Anonymous said...

You forgot to add that J and D will be saving thousands a year on medical insurance because of Health Kids. I would say net gain for J and D and their kids.